Well would you credit it? \u00a0Your very own IPAlchemist is now A Face of Chemistry! \u00a0Those who said I had to choose – I could be a lawyer or a chemist but not both – well they were wrong.<\/p>\n
Before I go on to explain what on earth I am talking about, I have to give the now-usual obligatory apology. \u00a0It has been MONTHS since I posted here. \u00a0It is not that nothing has been happening – far from it – but that what blogging time I have has been exclusively reserved for the IPKat<\/a> (check out the Publications<\/a> page for a periodically updated list of IPKat posts) with the only occasional foray as a guest blogger on the India-specialist Spicy IP blog<\/a>. \u00a0There have been some other writings as well, but for those too you have to peek at the Publications page as well.<\/p>\n Anyway, a little while ago those lovely people at the Royal Society of Chemistry (and I mean it – they really are lovely) asked if I would mind being filmed for the Faces of Chemistry series. \u00a0You can check the RSC’s explanation of the series on the Faces of Chemistry microsite<\/a>, but my understanding is that they are aimed at young adults, and that the intention is to encourage people to study chemistry to show what an amazing range of career opportunities it leads to. \u00a0Well that is very much my bag, and I will do anything I can to further and improve the public image of chemistry, so of course I said yes.<\/p>\n We burbled around for a little while making all the arrangements, and then on the appointed day two wonderful people came from the RSC with a cameraman who brought with him all that impressive looking kit. \u00a0The way they structured it was that the nice lady asked me lots of open questions, and then I was supposed to reply in such a way that when they edited out the questions, the answers by themselves would make sense. \u00a0Well I soon got the hang of it and we were away. \u00a0And then before I knew it they said they had enough material and that was it.<\/span><\/p>\n We had agreed that they would also film around the office, with me lecturing, working, discussing cases, and so on, and that they would also interview two other chemists in the firm – Fergus Tyrrell<\/a> who is my trainee, and Robert Lundie-Smith<\/a> who is an IP solicitor. \u00a0This would give different perspectives on the topic.<\/span><\/p>\n It turned out that they had so much material that they made two films – one of me, and one of Fergus and Robert. \u00a0So a little while later two draft edits appeared in my inbox.<\/p>\n Well, dear readers, I can tell you that although I can handle speaking in public and even being filmed, watching it back is quite another thing altogether. \u00a0All three of us found it excruciating watching ourselves, and my toes curled with embarrassment. \u00a0Why do I go “Ummm” so much? \u00a0Why do I look shiftily to one side when I am thinking? \u00a0Why did no-one tell me? \u00a0And do I really sound like that? \u00a0Not to mention look like that? \u00a0Apparently I do. \u00a0So I have watched the proofs twice for quality control purposes (in fact they were perfectly edited and I didn’t request any changes, and neither did my colleagues), and then never again. \u00a0Well, maybe one day I will bear to look once more.<\/p>\n Anyway you can go and watch them yourself on You Tube – Me<\/a> and Robert and Fergus<\/a>. \u00a0I will be very happy if you “like” it.<\/p>\n Or if you prefer it embedded in the RSC website, see here\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0for the series, and the individual resources of me<\/a> and Robert\/Fergus<\/a>.<\/p>\n The IPAlchemist would like to thank the RSC for a great opportunity. \u00a0It has been a joy and a privilege to be associated with this project.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"